Chail Wildlife Sanctuary (18146)
India, Asia
Site overview
KBA status: confirmed
Year of last assessment: 2004
National site name: Chail Wildlife Sanctuary
Central coordinates: Latitude: 30.9708, Longitude: 77.2328
System: terrestrial
Elevation (m): 701 to 2408
Area of KBA (km2): 105.47593
KBA classification: Global/Regional TBD
Legacy site: Yes
Site details
Site description: Chail Wildlife Sanctuary lies in Solan and Shimla districts. Formerly, it was the private game reserve of the Maharaja of Patiala. Inspite of degradation, it is still one of the best sanctuaries for the Cheer Pheasant Catreus wallichii. The Sanctuary has, within its boundaries, Chail town and numerous villages, and is connected by a forest corridor to the Shimla Water Catchment Sanctuary (an IBA) in the north. It comprises part of the catchment area of a tributary of the Giri River. The forest cover of the Sanctuary includes Himalayan Subtropical Pine Forest, Ban Oak Forest and Moru Oak Forest, according to the forest classification by Champion and Seth (1968). The dominant forest tree is Ban Oak Quercus incana, mixed with Chir Pine Pinus roxburghii at lower altitudes. Rhododendron Rhododendron arboreum forms pure stands in places and Cedar Cedrus deodara and Blue Pine Pinus wallichiana have been planted in some areas. There is little mature forest, and much secondary growth due to disturbance (Gaston and Singh 1980). Reference to the habitat map in Garson (1983) shows that the forest is largely confined to the northern half of the sanctuary. Around 418 ha were planted with Pine, Oak, Cedar and Robinia up to 1984 (Singh et al. 1990).
Rationale for qualifying as KBA: This site qualifies as a Key Biodiversity Area of international significance because it meets one or more previously established criteria and thresholds for identifying sites of biodiversity importance (including Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas, Alliance for Zero Extinction sites, and Key Biodiversity Areas)
Additional biodiversity: AVIFAUNA: At least 139 bird species are reported from the site (Naim Akhtar pers. comm. 2003), including five species of pheasants, i.e. Cheer, Koklass Pucrasia macrolopha, Kaleej Lophura leucomelanos, Peafowl Pavo cristatus and Red Junglefowl Gallus gallus. While Cheer Pheasant occurs only in grassland, Kaleej and Koklass occur in oak forest. This IBA is extremely important for the protection of the globally threatened Cheer Pheasant. In the late 1970s, Gaston and Singh (1980) and Gaston et al. (1981) estimated 40 to 60 pairs, while in March 1983, Garson (1983) estimated a minimum of 32 pairs. Sharma et al. (1990) conducted further surveys in March 1987, and recently Kalsi (1999) surveyed Cheer Pheasant in Himachal Pradesh between March and June, and found many pairs in Chail. Most recent work on this species is by Akhtar and Narang (2002) who found “high abundance of Cheer pheasant” in Chail. It is widely distributed in places called Blossom and Khari-un. They also found one more grassland site near Bhagairh village. This IBA lies in the Western Himalayas Endemic Bird Area (EBA) (Stattersfield et al. 1998) and Sino-Himalayan Subtropical Forest (Biome-7) and Sino-Himalayan Subtropical Forest (Biome-8) (BirdLife International, undated). Eleven species are considered restricted range in this EBA and in Chail WLS, only one species (Cheer Pheasant) has been identified till now in this category. Perhaps, more detailed studies are required here to find out whether other restricted range species occur here or not, although habitat and altitude look suitable for some of them. OTHER KEY FAUNA: Leopard Panthera pardus is the main predator, and has for its prey ungulates such as Barking Deer Muntiacus muntjak, Sambar Cervus unicolor and Goral Nemorhaedus goral. Goral occurs in very good numbers in Chail as evident by the encounter rate of 7 animals/km walk (S. Sathyakumar pers. comm. 2002). The European Red Deer Cervus elaphus was introduced more than half a century ago by the former Maharaja of Patiala (Singh et al. 1990), but none were sighted during a census in 1988 (S. Pandey pers. comm.). Other species include Asiatic Black Bear Ursus thibetanus, Wild Boar Sus scrofa, Common Langur Semnopithecus entellus and Black-naped Hare Lepus nigricollis.
Habitats
Land use: nature conservation and research | tourism/recreation | urban/industrial/transport
| IUCN Habitat | Coverage % | Habitat detail |
|---|---|---|
| Grassland | 50 | |
| Forest | 50 |
Threats
Summary of threats to biodiversity at KBA: MAIN THREATS: Forest fires; Livestock grazing; Firewood collection; Disturbance to birds. The Sanctuary area includes more than 120 villages, and even Chail town is located inside the Sanctuary! In addition, there are 18 private industries including sawmills inside the Sanctuary. The surrounding area is also populated densely. Therefore, this small Sanctuary is under tremendous human pressure due to fuelwood collection, livestock grazing, quarrying and other activities unfavourable for the Sanctuary. Only 100 ha of the forest is free from these problems. Various government departments such as the Public Works Department, Himachal Pradesh Tourism Department, Military Engineering Services, Himachal Pradesh Forest Department and Himachal Pradesh Horticulture Department are located within the Sanctuary. Residents of Chail demand that the Sanctuary should be denotified, as their private land lies within the sanctuary and they are not even able to repair their own houses due to the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972. They say that at least their land should be taken out of the Sanctuary. Two pheasant breeding centers, at Karium and at Blossom, are located within the Sanctuary where captive breeding of Cheer, Kaleej and Red Junglefowl are being attempted.
| Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Threat level 3 | Timing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agriculture & aquaculture | Livestock farming & ranching | Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | Ongoing |
| Natural system modifications | Fire & fire suppression | Increase in fire frequency/intensity | Ongoing |
| Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting | Unintentional effects: subsistence/small scale (species being assessed is not the target) [harvest] | Ongoing |
| Energy production & mining | Mining & quarrying | Ongoing | |
| Human intrusions & disturbance | Work & other activities | Ongoing | |
| Residential & commercial development | Commercial & industrial areas | Ongoing | |
| Residential & commercial development | Housing & urban areas | Ongoing |
Additional information
References: Akhtar, N. and Narang, M. L. (2002) Status, Distribution and Conservation of Galliformes in Chail Wildlife Sanctuary, Himachal Pradesh. Proceedings of National Seminar on Galliformes. AVC College, Mayiladuturai. Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1987) Compact Handbook of the Birds of India and Pakistan (Second Edition). Oxford University Press, Delhi. BirdLife International (undated) Important Bird Areas (IBAs) in Asia: Project briefing book. BirdLife International, Cambridge, U.K., unpublished. Champion, H. G. and Seth, S. K. (1968) A revised survey of forest types of India, Govt. of India Press, Delhi. Pp. 403. Garson, P. J. (1983) The cheer pheasant Catreus wallichii in Himachal Pradesh, Western Himalayas: an update. WPA Journal 8: 29-39. Gaston, A. J. and Singh, J. (1980) The status of the cheer pheasant Catreus wallichii, in the Chail Wildlife Sanctuary Himachal Pradesh. WPA Journal 5: 68-73. Gaston, A. J., Hunter, M. L. Jr, and Garson, P. J. (1981) The wildlife of Himachal Pradesh, Western Himalayas. University of Maine School of Forest Resources Technical Notes No. 82. Pp 159. Kalsi, R. S. (1999) Status and habitat of Cheer Pheasant in Himachal Pradesh. WPA-SARO News 1(1): 2-4. Sharma, V., Garson, P. J. and Khera, S. (1990) Status surveys of Cheer and Western Tragopan in Simla Hills of Himachal Pradesh. Pp 139-141. In: Pheasants in Asia 1989 (eds. Hill, D. A., Garson, P. J. and Jenkins, D.). World Pheasant Association, Reading, U.K. Singh, S., Kothari, A. and Pande, P. (Eds) (1990) Directory of national parks and sanctuaries in Himachal Pradesh: management status and profiles. Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi. Pp 164. Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. and Wege, D. C. (1998) Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 7. BirdLife International, Cambridge, U.K.