Key Biodiversity Areas

Pyagpur and Sitadwar Jheel (18430)
India, Asia

Site overview


KBA status: confirmed
Year of last assessment: 2004
National site name: Pyagpur and Sitadwar Jheel
Central coordinates: Latitude: 27.5167, Longitude: 81.9000
System: freshwater, terrestrial
Elevation (m): 125 00
Area of KBA (km2): 26.4376
KBA classification: Global/Regional TBD
Legacy site: Yes

Site details


Site description: Pyagpur Jheel (2,800 ha) is a shallow, freshwater lake with associated marshes on the plains between the Rapti and Ghagra rivers. It is an excellent permanent jheel of 1-3 m depth, and supports very important fishery. It has a tropical monsoon climate typical of the Gangetic Plains. It is state owned, and the surrounding area is privately owned agricultural land. Sitadwar (150 ha) is a similar shallow freshwater lake with associated marshes, situated some 20 km away on the plains between the Rapti and Ghagra rivers. It is a site of religious pilgrimage and festivals. Sitadwar Jheel is somewhat shallow, prone to drying out in summer. It is state owned, while the surrounding area is privately owned agricultural land (Islam 2001). Sitadwar has the usual complement of aquatic vegetation, some floating and emergent plants such as Ipomea carnea. Pyagpur jheel bears similar submerged, floating and emergent plants of a typical jheel of the Gangetic plains. It also suffers from infestation of Water Hyacinth Eichhcornia crassipes and Ipomea carnea.
Rationale for qualifying as KBA: This site qualifies as a Key Biodiversity Area of international significance because it meets one or more previously established criteria and thresholds for identifying sites of biodiversity importance (including Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas, Alliance for Zero Extinction sites, and Key Biodiversity Areas)
Additional biodiversity: AVIFAUNA: The site is important for migratory and resident waterfowl. Congregations of 100-150 Sarus Crane Grus antigone are found in certain months (K. S. Gopi Sunder, pers. comm. 2003). The Siberian Crane Grus leucogeranus was reported from Pyagpur jheel nearly 100 years ago (Ali and Ripley 1987). Despite the tremendous disturbance due to fishing activities, and some bird trapping, this jheel still supports thousands of waterfowl in winter. With better protection and restriction of fishing in some months, Pyagpur jheel could support 4-5 times more birds than it does today. In a short survey in 1986, Asad Rahmani and Carl D’Silva recorded the following species: Great White Pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus, Demoiselle Crane Grus virgo, Grey Heron Ardea cinerea, Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia, Lesser Whistling Duck Dendrocygna javanica, Pheasant-tailed Jacana Hydrophasianus chirurgus, Northern Shoveller Anas clypeata, Northern Pintail Anas acuta, Black-necked Stork Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus, Painted Stork Mycteria leucocephala, and Asian Openbill Anastomus oscitans (Scott 1989). Detailed investigation of avifauna is urgently required for this important waterfowl refuge. Sitadwar was also surveyed in 1986, by Rahmani and D’Silva, who recorded Great White Pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus, Grey Heron Ardea cinerea, Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia, Lesser Whistling Duck Dendrocygna javanica, Demoiselle Crane Grus virgo, Pheasant-tailed Jacana Hydrophasianus chirurgus and Sarus Crane Grus antigone (Scott 1989). OTHER KEY FAUNA: No terrestrial mammal of any conservation significance occurs in Pyagpur or Sitadwar wetlands. If fishery is controlled, these wetlands could become good habitats for the Smooth Indian Otter Lutra perspicillata.

Habitats


Land use: agriculture | fisheries/aquaculture
IUCN HabitatCoverage %Habitat detail
Wetlands(Inland)100

Threats


Summary of threats to biodiversity at KBA: MAIN THREATS: Fisheries; Disturbance to birds; Poaching; Weed infestation. Fishing and waterfowl hunting occurs in Pyagpur jheel, but the major threat is gradual encroachment for agricultural purposes. Intensive fishing causes excessive disturbance to the avifauna. Virtually the whole of Pyagpur is covered with Eichhornia crassipes.
Threat level 1Threat level 2Threat level 3Timing
Agriculture & aquacultureAnnual & perennial non-timber cropsSmall-holder farmingOngoing
Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesInvasive non-native/alien species/diseasesNamed speciesOngoing
Biological resource useHunting & collecting terrestrial animalsIntentional use (species being assessed is the target)Ongoing
Biological resource useFishing & harvesting aquatic resourcesUnintentional effects: subsistence/small scale (species being assessed is not the target) [harvest]Ongoing
Human intrusions & disturbanceWork & other activitiesOngoing

Additional information


References: Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D.(1987) Compact Edition of the Handbook of India and Pakistan (Second Edition). Oxford University Press, Delhi. Islam, M. Z. (2001) IBA Survey report of Uttar Pradesh. Unpublished.Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai. Scott, D. (ed.) (1989) A directory of Asian wetlands. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, U.K.