Key Biodiversity Areas

Lake Mburo National Park (7051)
Uganda, Africa

Site overview


KBA status: confirmed
Year of last assessment: 2012
National site name: Lake Mburo National Park
Central coordinates: Latitude: -0.6667, Longitude: 30.9167
System: freshwater, terrestrial
Elevation (m): 1280 to 1520
Area of KBA (km2): 369.14721
Protected area coverage (%): 95.25
KBA classification: Global/Regional TBD
Legacy site: Yes

Site details


Site description: This is a relatively new National Park, having been gazetted in 1982. Hilly and upland areas dominate the north-western part and the River Ruizi and an interlinking chain of lakes occupy the southern parts. From west to east these are: Mburo, Kigambira, Mutukula, Kazuma and Bwara. The Park contains a wide variety of habitat-types, which give it a surprisingly high diversity of animals and plants for its size. Acacia trees are widespread in many areas, such as well-drained hillsides and low-lying hilltops—places which were formerly much more open and which provided good grazing for cattle and wildlife. The present extent of the Acacia can probably be attributed to overgrazing and frequent burning.Today, there has been a reduction in the diversity of large mammals, as a result of human activity which, over the years, has included hunting, eradication of tsetse fly Glossina, and habitat destruction through cultivation and settlement. Some large mammals, such as Loxodonta africana and Diceros bicornis, are believed to have existed in the area formerly, but have been extinct for many years. Others, such as Panthera leo and Hippotragus equinus, have disappeared in recent years. Rainfall is fairly low and tends to be erratic and unreliable, causing shortage of pastures and thus affecting the behaviour of wildlife and creating demands on the park by local pastoralists. The Park’s location near the Masaka–Mbarara highway makes it easily accessible from Kampala. There are a number of tourist facilities and an education centre.
Rationale for qualifying as KBA: This site qualifies as a Key Biodiversity Area of international significance because it meets one or more previously established criteria and thresholds for identifying sites of biodiversity importance (including Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas, Alliance for Zero Extinction sites, and Key Biodiversity Areas)
Additional biodiversity: See Box and Tables 2 and 3 for key species. The park has a diverse bird fauna, with over 310 species recorded. These include a number that have not been recorded in other parks in Uganda such as Ardeola rufiventris, Tricholaema melanocephala, Eremomela scotops, Euplectes orix and Cisticola fulvicapillus. Lybius rubrifacies, a restricted-range species, is occasionally seen, but is rare, probably reaching its northern limit here, and not known anywhere else in Uganda. The site is important for certain species of the Lake Victoria Basin biome, such as Bradypterus carpalis and Cisticola carruthersi, which are rare in other IBAs. The site has one Afrotropical Highlands biome species, Ploceus baglafecht. There are isolated records of two globally near-threatened species, Phoenicopterus minor and Gallinago media. Torgos tracheliotus occurs. Non-bird biodiversity: Lake Mburo is the only National Park in Uganda in which the ungulate Aepyceros melampus (LR/cd) is found.

Habitats


Land use: agriculture | nature conservation and research | tourism/recreation
IUCN HabitatCoverage %Habitat detail
Grassland5
Artificial - Terrestrial14
Wetlands(Inland)7
Forest15
Shrubland56

Threats


Summary of threats to biodiversity at KBA: The Park was formerly a Game Reserve in which 300 families, with their cattle herds, resided. Gazettement as a Park resulted in the entire population being evicted. This created hostility from the local people, a situation that was exploited by both local and national politicians to further their interests. A compromise, through which the park was reduced by over 50% to the present size, was reached in 1986.The animosity created between local communities and the park since its gazettement has persisted to some extent. The conflict is mainly over grazing and water. Approximately 20,000 head of cattle more-or-less regularly graze in neighbouring areas, which were degazetted in 1986. During periods of drought, the pastoralists look to the park for grazing and water. Agriculturists are also a potential threat to the park, since the wetter parts of the area, which was degazetted in 1986, are now under cultivation, and a settlement scheme has also been established on the fringes of the park. Crop-raiding by wildlife causes conflict. However, efforts to involve the communities in conservation and to sensitize them to the value of wildlife, coupled with other initiatives, such as provision of water outside the park, are gradually reducing these threats. A lot, however, remains to be done.
Threat level 1Threat level 2Threat level 3Timing
Agriculture & aquacultureLivestock farming & ranchingAgro-industry grazing, ranching or farmingOngoing
Natural system modificationsFire & fire suppressionIncrease in fire frequency/intensityOngoing
Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesProblematic native species/diseasesNamed speciesOngoing
Biological resource useGathering terrestrial plantsUnintentional effects (species being assessed is not the target)Ongoing
Biological resource useFishing & harvesting aquatic resourcesUnintentional effects: subsistence/small scale (species being assessed is not the target) [harvest]Ongoing

Additional information


References: Busulwa (1993), Infield and Namara (2001), Kamugisha and Stahl (1993), Muhweezi (1994), Pomeroy and Kasoma (1993), Reynolds and Pomeroy (1993), UNEP (1988a), Snelson and Wilson (1994).